Zdenek Oliva Problemikste 1995 |
1.Ka8 d8R+ 2.Ka1 h8B# |
| |
h#2 (3+1) 1+1 transmuting king 2.1.1.1 |
Gerhard Pfeiffer 3rd Prize Europa Rochade 1992-93 |
1.b1S Kf1 2.Sxc3 Ke1 3.Se4 f8Q 4.Sc5 Qf1# Spotlight comment by Juraj Lörinc: This helpmate is a real proof that even the most simple position can be actually difficult to understand correctly. With a White Maximummer condition the play should not be too complicated, should be? Actually I have made a mistake when originally commenting on this one. The need to close the bishop line in the first solution is only secondary and 4.Sf2? is not an option at all. Primarily it is important to close line of promoted wQ, namely f8-a3, which can be closed by two almost same moves - 4.Sd6? and 4.Sc5! The secondary motif is important as it forces the right option after all. Furthermore, note the different approach of solution to allow promotion of wp. In the first solution wK walks into position without any diagonal move possible twice, but with Kf1 no queen mate is possible. In the second solution Black does not care about wK who walks to c4 without complication, just to ensure right arrival square for the promoted bishop. 3.Rg8 simply allows longer move for wP. The more I look at this maximummer, the more I like it. |
| |
h#4 (3+4) White Maximummer 2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 |
Luigi Vitale 2672 Phénix 54 - 1997 |
1.Kd8 Kxg7 2.Ke7 Kxh6 3.Kf6 Kh7 4.Kg5 Kg8 5.Kh6 Kxh8# |
| |
h#5 (4+6) Madrasi |
Markus Ott 4th HM feenschach 1991 |
1...Sh2 2.Kg1 Shg4 3.Ba8 Sh3+ 4.Kh1 Sxg5 5.Bg2 Sf3 6.g5 Sf2# |
| |
h#5,5 (3+5) Maximummer |
Gunter Jordan Problemkiste 1999 |
1.f6 h3 2.f5 h4 3.f4 h5 4.f3 h6 5.f2 hxg7 6.f1S gxf8S‡ |
| |
h#6 (6+10) Double Minimummer |
Jörg Kuhlmann Achim Schöneberg feenschach 71 - 1984 |
1.Sc2 Ra2 2.Sb4 Rb2 3.Sd3 Rb3 4.Sc5 Rc3 5.Se4 Rc4 6.Sd6 Rd4
7.Sf5 Rd5 8.Se7 Re5 9.Sg6 Re6 10.Sf8 Rf6 11.Sh7 Rf8# |
| |
h#11 (1+3) Beamtenschach |
Comments to
Juraj Lörinc.
Back to main page of Chess Composition Microweb.